-
Featured Authors
Archive
- May 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (5)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (7)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (8)
- June 2011 (16)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (9)
- January 2011 (15)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (5)
- November 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (1)
Category Archives: Patently BIOtech
Australian Senate Committee Recommends Against Banning ‘Gene Patents’
The Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee recommended against the Patent Amendment (Human Genes and Biological Materials) which would have banned DNA patents in Australia. The push by members of the Australian Senate seemed to mirror efforts in the United States surrounding the Myriad case. The Committee found that: “While previous inquiries and public discussions have focused on the patenting of human genes, the Bill goes further and proposes a specific exclusion for biological materials which Read More >
Technology Transfer Symposium in San Francisco
In the midst of turbulent economic times, and at a moment when the U.S. is looking to encourage technology job creation in the coming decade, an increasing number of public and private sector initiatives have been proposed to spur job creation. While the U.S. leads in the area of biotechnology, there is no guarantee that this competitive edge will continue. Moreover, although the U.S. is more prolific in life science discoveries than any other single country in the Read More >
Bi-partisan Senate Letter asking for 12 years of Data Protection in TPP
Senators Hatch and Kerry, along with 35 other Senators, sent a letter to Ambassador Kirk asking for 12 years of regulatory data protection consistent with U.S. law in the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. We are united in urging you to propose a strong minimum term of regulatory data protection for biologics consistent with U.S. law. As you are aware, U.S. law provides for a 12-year term of regulatory data protection for biologics and we believe that should serve Read More >
Data Protection, Trans Pacific Partnership, and the US-Jordan FTA (Post 2 of 2)
This post is a continuation of a previous post: Data Protection, the Trans Pacific Partnership, and the US-Jordan FTA (Post 1 of 2). 4. Oxfam criticizes pharmaceutical innovators for not making all of their innovative drugs available in Jordan. Ryan responds: a. Innovator companies introduced few new drugs before IP reform because local companies were using their know-how and clinical data to get marketing approval and brochures describing the drug’s therapeutic function and side effects Read More >
Data Protection, the Trans Pacific Partnership, and the US-Jordan FTA (Post 1 of 2)
The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiation does not yet include a section on data protection (typically included in the Pharmaceutical Chapter of Free Trade Agreements). Organizations against the inclusion of data protection in the TPP cite as evidence an Oxfam International study titled “All Costs, No Benefits: How TRIPS-plus intellectual property rules in the US-Jordan FTA affect access to medicines.” The Oxfam paper concludes that “medicine prices have increased drastically, and TRIPS-plus rules were partly Read More >
