- Our LinkedIn Page
- Our Twitter Feed
- Our Facebook Page
- Newsletter Subscribe to our e-newsletter. Current Issue
- Our Flickr Feed
- Our YouTube Feed
Tags
BIO drug development AUTM Gene Patents BIO International Convention BIO Investor Forum National Institutes of Health India Technology Transfer PTO patent innovation vaccines biotechnology NIH United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO 2012 BIO International Convention Intellectual Property Patent ReformAuthors
- Abigail Hirsch
- Alan Eisenberg
- BIOtechNOW Editor
- Bruce Dale
- Celia Economides
- Colleen Lerro
- David Thomas, CFA
- George Goodno
- George MacDougall
- Jason Corum
- Jeff Joseph
- Jim Greenwood
- Karen Batra
- Kelly Cappio
- Lila Feisee
- Matt Carr
- Nathan Schock
- Paul Winters
- Paulina Ibarra
- Robbi Lycett
- Roy Zwahlen
- Sarah Sneeringer
- Sondra Behan
- Stephanie Fischer
- Stephen Marmaras
- Tracy Cooley
Archive
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (8)
- June 2011 (16)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (9)
- January 2011 (15)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (5)
- November 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (9)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (9)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (1)
Category Archives: Patently BIOtech
Patents for Humanity
By David Kappos, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Originally Published on USPTO Director’s Forum Sweeping revolutions in technology continue to fundamentally redefine the way we connect with one another and interact with the world. Today, an entrepreneur can do business with a remote village across an ocean just as quickly as a student in Boston can video-conference with a professor in Beijing. Political rallies can be organized by the click of Read More >
PTO Genetic Testing Study: What’s Patents Got to Do with It
The USPTO held a hearing on February 16 to collect testimony from interested parties to discuss factors affecting the availability of confirmatory, or second opinion, genetic testing. However, the hearing quickly devolved into testimonies addressing so called ‘gene patents’ and genetic testing more broadly. Dr. Hans Sauer testified on behalf of BIO and first raised the question whether there is in fact patient demand for an ‘independent second opinion genetic test.’ While doctors would likely Read More >
Biotech IP Challenges Around the World: BIO’s Special 301 Submission
BIO recently submitted its Special 301 Submission highlighting intellectual property (IP) challenges around the world. In particular, BIO informed the United States Trade Representative (USTR) of the persistent problems biotech companies face with issues including counterfeiting, large backlogs and patent office inefficiency, differing judicial standards for enforcement, compulsory licensing, inadequate data protection, lack of patentability of biotech inventions, overbearing genetic resources access and benefit regimes, technology transfer issues and a great need for international harmonization Read More >
AUTM Website Helps Commercialize University Technologies
By Robin L. Rasor, CLP, RTTP, AUTM President As president of the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), I’m in a unique position of hearing from university technology managers who want more opportunity to interact with industry, and industry members who want to identify the latest breakthrough innovations. Industry investors and their academic licensing counterparts already come together for dealmaking at the AUTM Annual Meeting and at the BIO International Convention, but now we have Read More >
Patent Awards for Humanitarian Ventures
The USPTO recently announced the Patents for Humanity Challenge which awards patent owners and licensees for innovations that address humanitarian needs. Judges will chose winners from four categories: Medical technology – includes medicines, vaccines, diagnostic equipment, or assistive devices. Food and nutrition – includes agricultural technology like drought-resistant crops, more nutritious crop strains, farming equipment, and technologies that improve food storage, preservation, or preparation. Clean technology – includes technologies that improve public health by removing Read More >
