-
Featured Authors
-
Archives
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
-
Meta
Tag Archives: gene patents
IP Position Critical to Biotech Investment
A great article from Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News written by Lisa Haile reviewing the Myriad case and its implications for future medical advances. Interesting Quotes: “While it is unfortunate, I have seen quite a few technologies over the years that would be of potential great benefit to patients, but the intellectual property was simply not there to support protecting the product from fast followers in the market place,” explains Robert More, a general partner Read More >
BIO submits comments on Australian Senate Patent Amendment
The Australian Senate has proposed the Patent Amendment (Human Genes and Biological Materials) Bill 2010 that aims to ban ‘gene patents’. From the BIO Submission to Australian Senate Legal Committee on Patent Amendment: This amendment would exclude from patent protection “any” biological material, whether a human gene or otherwise, that is substantially identical to a naturally-occuring biological material. Specifically, the amendment states that the following materials would be catergorically declared unpatentable: “biological materials including their components Read More >
Patently BIOtech
Leave a comment
Email This Post
Tags: animal healthcare products, antibiotics, Australia, Australian Senate, Australian Senate Legal Committee on Patent Amendment, biological materials, biotechnology, celss, diagnostics, DNA, DNA patents, drugs, environmental mitigation and remediation, Gene Patents, gene patents, Green Technology, human health, insulin, patent, Patent Amendment (Human Genes and Biological Materials) Bill 2010, proteins, renewable energy, RNA, therapeutics
Tags: animal healthcare products, antibiotics, Australia, Australian Senate, Australian Senate Legal Committee on Patent Amendment, biological materials, biotechnology, celss, diagnostics, DNA, DNA patents, drugs, environmental mitigation and remediation, Gene Patents, gene patents, Green Technology, human health, insulin, patent, Patent Amendment (Human Genes and Biological Materials) Bill 2010, proteins, renewable energy, RNA, therapeutics
Is the Myriad Case Decision and/or the DOJ Brief TRIPS Compliant?
Judge Sweet seemed to dismiss Myriad’s constitutional taking and TRIPS claims by indicating: “Finally, Myriad’s suggestion that invalidating the patents-in-suit would constitute an unconstitutional taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution or a violation of the United States’ obligations under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPS”) is unpersuasive. Myriad’s novel taking argument runs counter to a long history of invalidation of patent claims by the courts and is unsupported by legal Read More >
Patently BIOtech
Leave a comment
Email This Post
Tags: BIO, Department of Justice, DNA, DNA patents, DOJ, gene, Gene Patents, gene patents, Global Health, International, International law, isolated and purified DNA, isolated DNA, Judge Sweet, Myriad, Patent Reform, patents, TRIPS, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Tags: BIO, Department of Justice, DNA, DNA patents, DOJ, gene, Gene Patents, gene patents, Global Health, International, International law, isolated and purified DNA, isolated DNA, Judge Sweet, Myriad, Patent Reform, patents, TRIPS, United States Patent and Trademark Office
