Tag Archives: Intellectual Property

BIO Submits Amicus Briefs in Braintree v. Novel, Gilead v. Natco, and Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Teva Pharmaceuticals

scientist-eyedropper

BIO has submitted briefs in three recent cases which could significantly impair drug and biotechnology efforts, urging reconsideration and review from both the Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. BIO, in conjunction with PhRMA, submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Braintree v. Novel, arguing that the majority’s decision creates an unpredictable climate for patent claims. Vacating the prior claim construction precedent which had repeatedly interpreted “a” Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , ,

PTO Patent Examinations in the wake of Mayo and Myriad

stopped-media-115x76

Biotech patent applicants are finding themselves in uncharted waters.   After the Supreme Court’s decisions in Mayo Collaborative Svs. v. Prometheus Labs and Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, companies have been trying to understand how these decisions will impact the industry. A recent study supported by BIO, in collaboration with Bloomberg BNA and the law firm of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi analyzed how Mayo and Myriad have changed patent eligibility for biotechnology. Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BIO Submits Comments on “Myriad” PTO Patent Guidance

Supreme Court - Phil Roeder

On July 31st, BIO, alongside a group of international bioindustry trade associations submitted comments to the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding their March 4, 2014 Guidance on patent subject matter eligibility. Representing associations from Japan, Australia, Canada, the UK, Germany, Spain, Portugal Belgium, the Netherlands and others, the comments reflect a deep concern among the international community regarding how the PTO is interpreting the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Mayo v. Prometheus and Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What International Trade Agreements Have to Do with Innovation

Attendees

Innovation is not just the life-blood of the biotech industry, it is the very premise of the BIO International Convention. So what is a panel on international trade doing here? Answering this question is the task panel moderator, Richard Bergstrom, Director General, EFPIA gave to participants in the session TTIP: Can US and the EU Lead the Way in Setting New Global Benchmarks for IP, Regulatory and Market Access Issues; and each provided a piece Read More >

Public Policy  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , ,

Protecting your IP Overseas

shutterstock_2103563

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), nearly 100,000 biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent applications are filed worldwide each year, and the trend appears to be rising. As you’ve likely experienced, filing patent applications can be very complex, with different laws, deadlines and languages requiring highly technical translators for most countries in which you’re seeking protection. As a result, companies seeking IP protection often outsource their domestic and foreign patent filings to service providers to Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,