Tag Archives: Intellectual Property

BIO Submits Joint Supplemental Comments on the USPTO March Guidance

Supreme Court

Last week BIO, alongside a number of member companies and private individuals, submitted supplemental comments to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office concerning their March 2014 Guidance on patent subject matter eligibility. In July, BIO and international bio-industry associations had submitted comments to the USPTO expressing concern about the Guidance, and its impact on the patent eligibility of biotechnology inventions. Since July, USPTO staff has indicated a final revision to the Guidance would be released Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Patent Cases Down by 40% in 2014

Patent-Case-Filings-by-Month-2011-20141

The number of new patent cases filed in federal court has dropped by an astonishing 40 percent as compared to this time last year. This trend has some questioning whether Congressional patent reform is even necessary. Some legal experts are attributing this drop to the fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Alice vs. CLS Bank decision. In June, SCOTUS ruled in the case of Alice that certain subject matter which had been patentable (a computer-implemented Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Washington Post: Are Patents the Problem?

Tamar-Haspel

Tamar Haspel, food columnist for the Washington Post, looks at the issue of seed patents in her October column: If you’re at the right party — a party populated by agriculture wonks — the issue of patenting living organisms might get more of a rise than either religion or politics, demonstrating both that patenting is a hot issue and that agriculture wonks aren’t much of a hit at parties (trust me on this one). A Read More >

Farmer Gene  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , ,

BIO Submits Amicus Briefs in Braintree v. Novel, Gilead v. Natco, and Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Teva Pharmaceuticals

scientist-eyedropper

BIO has submitted briefs in three recent cases which could significantly impair drug and biotechnology efforts, urging reconsideration and review from both the Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. BIO, in conjunction with PhRMA, submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Braintree v. Novel, arguing that the majority’s decision creates an unpredictable climate for patent claims. Vacating the prior claim construction precedent which had repeatedly interpreted “a” Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , ,

PTO Patent Examinations in the wake of Mayo and Myriad

stopped-media-115x76

Biotech patent applicants are finding themselves in uncharted waters.   After the Supreme Court’s decisions in Mayo Collaborative Svs. v. Prometheus Labs and Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, companies have been trying to understand how these decisions will impact the industry. A recent study supported by BIO, in collaboration with Bloomberg BNA and the law firm of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi analyzed how Mayo and Myriad have changed patent eligibility for biotechnology. Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,