Tag Archives: IP

Supreme Court Decision on Web Content Delivery to Impact Biotech Patents

Zuhn

Earlier this month, in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., the Supreme Court issued a decision that will likely impact patents directed to methods for treating or diagnosing diseases.  In Limelight Networks, the Court reversed the appellate court’s finding that Limelight had infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,108,703, which is assigned to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is exclusively licensed to Akamai Technologies.  In particular, the Court determined that a defendant is not liable Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , ,

IP at the 2014 BIO International Convention

San Diego

Securing and maintaining intellectual property protection for the next generation of biotech innovation faces new challenges and opportunities.  Come learn about current issues and those just on the horizon before they affect your practice and your company. Keynote Speakers in the IP Track: Director General Francis Gurry, World Intellectual Property Organization Judge Randall R. Rader, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Acting Director Michelle Lee, United States Patent and Trademark Office IP Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , ,

Nautilus v. Biosig, Baxter v. Fresenius and Limelight v. Akamai

Supreme Court

BIO weighed in on three Supreme Court cases in the last few months whose outcome could change the IP landscape for biotechnology companies. BIO’s amicus brief in Nautilus v. Biosig Instruments argues that the petitioner misrepresents the Federal Circuit’s definiteness test and seeks to litigate an issue not properly before this court.  Petitioner’s approach radically departs from established law and practice.  Finally the petitioner’s approach would destabilize the patent system as it would inject substantial Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Special 301: BIO Highlights Challenges in India

cells115x76

BIO recently testified before the U.S. government on the intellectual property challenges our members face in various markets around the world. Among other matters, BIO recommended that the U.S. government designate India as a Priority Foreign Country, a designation that would lead to the consideration of trade sanctions for treaty violations. Specifically, BIO testified: “In the healthcare space, only a few dozen innovative and patent protected medicines are on the market in India. Yet, in Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Report Shows World’s Weakest IP Environments

admin-ajax

There is clear link between a country’s rate of economic development and the strength of its intellectual property laws. This is particularly true in knowledge-intensive sectors such as biopharmaceuticals. The good news is that some mature and emerging economies are making growing use of patent systems to facilitate biotechnology research and commercialization. The bad news is that a number of countries, including India, China, Brazil and Canada, have established bureaucratic and burdensome hurdles to patentability. Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , ,