Tag Archives: labeling

34 daily newspapers from California urge voters to vote NO on Prop 37


In recent editorials, California’s major daily newspapers are urging voters to reject Proposition 37 on the November ballot.  Read all No on Prop. 37 editorials here. The San Jose Mercury News says Prop 37 has best of intent, but bad drafting. “Proposition 37 should never have been placed on the ballot this fall.”  “…there are real problems with this particular law.” “A badly drafted law with good intentions is still a bad law.” “Voters should reject Read More >

Farmer Gene  |  2 Comments  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , ,

Prop 37 Promises to Rattle the Entire U.S. Food Chain


Debate continues on whether or not the labeling of foods derived from biotechnology is needed or helpful.  In a report for the Los Angeles Times, reporter Marc Lifscher puts the issue in context.  As the fight over genetically engineered foods heads for the ballot box, government and academic experts still struggle to find reason in this debate: California could become the first state to require labels on genetically modified, or GMO, food products as parties on both Read More >

Farmer Gene  |  1 Comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Shoppers Already Have a Choice Regarding Biotech Foods

Greg Conko

Food Chemical News (an Agra Informa publication) ran a thorough editorial in its February 17 edition on the biotech food labeling debate. In this piece, Gregory Conko, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, explains why it would be unnecessary to require special labeling for foods containing biotech ingredients: “Today, there are many thousands of affirmatively labeled, non-biotech foods available in stores as varied as Whole Foods Markets and Wal-Mart. “From just 2000 to Read More >

Farmer Gene  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , ,