Tag Archives: patents

Will the PTAB Be A Roadblock for Biotech? Stories from Sessions at BIO 2016

stethoscope

We’re at the beginning of day 3 here at BIO 2016, and that means we’ve already had a full day of high quality programming for our Intellectual Property track! Let’s take a look at one of yesterday’s most popular sessions. Will the PTAB be a Road Block for Biotech? Lessons Learned from the First Three Years of Inter-Partes Review and Future Prospects Moderated by William Kubetin, Managing Editor at Bloomberg BNA Panelists: Kevin Noonan, Partner at McDonnell, Boehnen, Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“II Ca-Be-lly, or Not II Ca-Be-lly?”: Is The Famous Cabilly II Antibody Patent Near Extinction?

N_logo_2clr

Guest post by Konstantin Linnik, Ph.D., Isaac Hubner, Ph.D, and Lana Gladstein, who are attorneys in the Boston office of Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP. On February 5, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued a decision to institute an Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of Genentech’s “Cabilly II” patent (U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415). This triggered the one-month deadline for third parties to request joinder under 37 CFR § 42.122(b).  Whether you are a licensee, or otherwise Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Here are the Facts about the IPR Kill Rate

US_Patent_And_Trademark_Office

FiercePhrma recently ran an article repeating a dubious analysis of the crisis caused by the rapidly increasing number of biopharma related inter partes reviews (IPR) currently within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). It is troubling that in a single breath Ronny Gal both dismissed the biopharmaceutical industry’s concerns with the PTO’s IPR process and acknowledged that limited data prevents any firm conclusions about the potential impact of IPR on biotech innovation. If Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , ,

102 Organizations Urge Congress to Maintain a Strong Patent System and Protect Innovation

US Capitol Building

A diverse group of more than 100 national and state-based advocacy organizations have united to urge Congress to preserve important patent protections that incentivize biopharmaceutical research necessary to innovate and develop new cures and treatments for serious diseases. In a letter sent to the Hill this week, these patient advocates asked Congress to amend the Innovation Act (H.R. 9) to preserve the highly-detailed and sophisticated systems designed by Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA and avoid weakening the Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , ,

CNBC Commentary: Hedge funds, ‘reverse trolls’ crushing biopharma innovation

Vote No on HR 9

Patents are the lifeblood of medical innovation. They are the cornerstone that enables companies to perform the long and costly research and development for cures and therapies to combat devastating diseases such as cancer, HIV and Alzheimer’s. Unfortunately, the system that helps protect these innovations is being abused by outside interests. BIO and others have called upon Congress to fix these problems as part of a greater patent reform debate. Today one more voice joined Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , ,