Tag Archives: patents

When The Deck is Stacked Against Innovators, Everyone Loses


Yesterday, I took part in a series of successful meetings on Capitol Hill regarding the USPTO’s Inter Partes Review system (IPR). Joined by several of BIO’s member companies, we expressed our concerns with how the system is evolving into one which makes it easier for IPR challengers to win than in Federal Court. The implementation of the IPR system – developed through the 2011 America Invests Act – has unintentionally invited abuses of the USPTO Read More >

Jim's Corner  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , ,

Should the USPTO Allow the Patenting of Living Organisms?


Last year, a question was submitted to the GMO advocacy website GMOAnswers about whether or not the USPTO should allow the patenting of living organisms. Under 35 U.S.C. 101, “the laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas have been held not patentable.” Therefore the USPTO cannot and does not award patents on living organisms that were merely discovered in nature. However, the U.S. Supreme Court Ruled in Diamond v. Chakrabarty that a “nonnaturally occurring Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Washington Post: Are Patents the Problem?


Tamar Haspel, food columnist for the Washington Post, looks at the issue of seed patents in her October column: If you’re at the right party — a party populated by agriculture wonks — the issue of patenting living organisms might get more of a rise than either religion or politics, demonstrating both that patenting is a hot issue and that agriculture wonks aren’t much of a hit at parties (trust me on this one). A Read More >

Farmer Gene  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , ,

Detailed Report Examines the Crucial Role of Patents in Genetic Testing


In The Critical Role of Patents in the Development, Commercialization, and Utilization of Innovative Genetic Diagnostic Tests, Professor Holman argues that advocates for weakening patent protection have fundamental misconceptions on the role of patents in genetic testing. Opponents assume that patents negatively impact patient access to genetic diagnostic testing. They believe that patents inhibit research that could lead to new or improved versions of genetic tests, and that patent holders charge higher prices as exclusive Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Protecting your IP Overseas


According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), nearly 100,000 biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent applications are filed worldwide each year, and the trend appears to be rising. As you’ve likely experienced, filing patent applications can be very complex, with different laws, deadlines and languages requiring highly technical translators for most countries in which you’re seeking protection. As a result, companies seeking IP protection often outsource their domestic and foreign patent filings to service providers to Read More >

Patently BIOtech  |  Leave a comment  |  Email This Post
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,